proof of shallowness
Aug. 23rd, 2004 07:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
egypturnashSo I chased a link to this site that claims to be about "questioning transgender politics" but is mostly about claiming that all MtFs horrible evil MEN who want to SUBVERT FEMINISM and INVADE WOMYN-ONLY SPACES. And, okay, this is an attitude that vaguely pisses me off, because I'm not one, and I don't want to, and that's just silly. If I wanted to be all exclusionist and go hang out with nothing but women, except that my definition includes womyn-born-morlocksmen, I'd, like, try and start a better girls-only club that's, you know, cooler, instead of trying to change minds by yelling at crusty old lesbians who think A Penis Is Forever.
But anyway. That's not the point I'm going to make here. The point is that this site's design was aggressively horrible - I don't know if it works right on Explorer, but on both Camino and Safari, it was utterly broken, and most of the black body text ran off the tiny little pixel-specified box into the black background. It was so aggressively bad that the combination of the 'zap presentational HTML' and 'zap CSS' bookmarklets still had the text squeezed into tiny little columns. I think that if it worked "right" the text would've been squeezed into a tiny little box, far too tiny to read.
And I'd have been annoyed at the content no matter what it was, because I had to fight to read the thing. Yeah, call me evil and make finding out exactly what kind of evil you're pinning on me utter pain and suffering, thanks, miss "radical feminist".
Presentation matters. Aggressively bad presentation doesn't win you any friends.
But anyway. That's not the point I'm going to make here. The point is that this site's design was aggressively horrible - I don't know if it works right on Explorer, but on both Camino and Safari, it was utterly broken, and most of the black body text ran off the tiny little pixel-specified box into the black background. It was so aggressively bad that the combination of the 'zap presentational HTML' and 'zap CSS' bookmarklets still had the text squeezed into tiny little columns. I think that if it worked "right" the text would've been squeezed into a tiny little box, far too tiny to read.
And I'd have been annoyed at the content no matter what it was, because I had to fight to read the thing. Yeah, call me evil and make finding out exactly what kind of evil you're pinning on me utter pain and suffering, thanks, miss "radical feminist".
Presentation matters. Aggressively bad presentation doesn't win you any friends.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:13 pm (UTC)I was offended as much as a design geek as a dickgirl. Maybe more. And the amusement of that fact is why I wrote about it.
I sent 'em an e-mail politely pointing them to alistapart and the css-discuss wiki. n.n
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 11:21 pm (UTC)Unless it's as some kind of weird art missionary thing. Pro bono work. "Normally I charge $50/h for a site like this, but I'm doing my part to make the kook sites of the world more visually compelling. You've gotta give something back, you know?"
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:10 pm (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist_rage/329680.html
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:20 pm (UTC)At least my annoyance with it was amusingly different!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:18 pm (UTC)Riki Wilchins briefly covers some run-ins with the feminists to both good and bad effect, sometimes very poorly received, sometimes received with open arms and fascination. In Read My Lips ( http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1563410907 ) there was a point where Ricki let a bunch of curious feminists check out the new gear. I could understand that. I was more than a little baffled at points where Ricki wasn't so well received however. I mean, I'd think for a group so focused on the supremacy of the stink blossom (feminism isn't about equality, folks -- seriously) the whole gender-crossing thing would be received as a compliment at worst.
I think I liked that Riki treated the whole deal in every case with humor and a little emotional detachment when things got weird, instead of the bad CSS.
-- McGroarty
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 08:37 pm (UTC)Mostly I just brush this kind of stuff off as part of the fact that TGs are the New Queers.Gays are getting married and getting societal acceptance, now they want to take their turn jumping up and down on the freaks too. *shrug*
I try to not let this kind of thing get to me. I'm sure I'll get more of it, to my face, as I start spending more time out socializing, too...
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 11:05 pm (UTC)OK, we'll let you people in. But it's getting awfully crowded. Just guard the door for us, 'kay? Atta girls.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 10:11 pm (UTC)I have to wonder, though, what those twits think of FtMs...
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 10:19 pm (UTC)Kinda like the way I'm a man in the eyes of the Catholic church, except in the event of me wanting to marry a woman. Then, and only then, am I a woman.
Woo. Ain't dogma grand?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 10:37 pm (UTC)Oh, and the site looks just as bad in IE as anything else.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-23 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 12:20 am (UTC)hello. my name's emily. and i'm from camp trans.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 02:11 am (UTC)I do ignore them. Just trying to make sense of the random babbling on that website was about the most attention I've given that sort of person. If I start running into people like this in the flesh I'll probably end up arguing, but only because I'll start calling them by the wrong pronoun until they call me by the right one.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 05:13 am (UTC)