prodigy, 2
Nov. 22nd, 2005 12:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Lots of interesting thoughts on yesterday's entry about the seeming lack of visual arts prodigies.
Here's a thought I had regarding the lack, after going through more replies than I thought there were (LJ's being slow on the notification mails): To be a good artist, first you must learn to see like an adult; then you must learn to see like a child again.
And these things have to happen in sequence; by their nature, they can't overlap. And they take time.
Here's a thought I had regarding the lack, after going through more replies than I thought there were (LJ's being slow on the notification mails): To be a good artist, first you must learn to see like an adult; then you must learn to see like a child again.
And these things have to happen in sequence; by their nature, they can't overlap. And they take time.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 02:45 am (UTC)Attempts to find that quote brings up this other Picasso quote: "Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once we grow up."
That is a true observation, and any artist who experiments with both realism and abstraction will run into it at some point. Adult-sight shows all these "realistic" details that are how things are really shaped, but you've got to learn how to see things like that. A lot of those are counterintuitive to learn, too, and it amounts to spending a lot of study to try and resemble a camera. Child-sight is how people *really* see, since only some portions of reality make their way into a person's brain, and those are often iconic. The parts that seem new or important seem larger than the rest. Child-sight is all about how things look in your brain rather than how they look in a camera. The irony is that you have to have worked hard on conveying adult-sight before you can really begin to convey child-sight as it really is.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 10:13 am (UTC)