more internet idiocy
May. 12th, 2004 04:23 pmOh no, oh no, that Something Awful site did another attack on furries.
It's the most painfully unfunny thing I've ever read. You know, I've seen people apologize for lame attack humor articles on SA because they weren't written by Lowtax,, and it seems he's the core of the site, but, geeze, this is the most long-winded unfunny thing that's supposed to be funny that I've read in a long time.
I usually only read Something Awful when someone points to an article. I don't follow it. I don't look at it regularly. I'm not sure I've ever actually read anything written by the Comedy God of Something Awful, Lowtax, until today.
I wondered if he was just having a lame day. This beating-a-dead-horse didn't seem at all like the kind of sparkling wit that people always kinda implied Lowtax was capable of when apologizing for other people's writing on the site, or for the behavior of the "tl;dr lollersk8ts <img src=goatse.cx> what" crowd. So I poked in the archives and read the previous article by him. And it was the same exact thing. A long litany of the imbecelity of some people whose bodies are less than perfect who dared to do something creative, silly, and shamelessly dorky, and didn't have the skills yet to do it perfectly. And it went on way too long.
I began to wonder if this guy has a secret desire for cosplay he's denying, given that the furry article was obsessed with fursuit sex.
Then I used SA's search feature and asked for all articles by Rich "Lowtax" Kyanka. I poked at random through them, looking for funny. I smirked a few times. I didn't giggle or laugh. Mostly I felt like I was reading a lame clone of Dave Barry, with an obsession with mocking anything that's done with far more heart than skill. Who is occasionally mildly bemusing but ruins it by just running his point into the ground - every single article seemed like it was at least half again as long as it should have been. This guy needs to edit his stuff, badly.
Was this guy ever funny? SA is his site, right, I'm told it owes its popularity to his skill at humor. I don't see this. He's not even very good at mocking fish in a barrel.
Is he funnier if I browse with images on? He sure isn't funny without his props. Kinda like Gallagher without the vicarous glee of the Sledge-O-Matic.
The first person who points me to an article by Lowtax that actually makes me laugh is going to get some kind of reward. Probably art.
It's the most painfully unfunny thing I've ever read. You know, I've seen people apologize for lame attack humor articles on SA because they weren't written by Lowtax,, and it seems he's the core of the site, but, geeze, this is the most long-winded unfunny thing that's supposed to be funny that I've read in a long time.
I usually only read Something Awful when someone points to an article. I don't follow it. I don't look at it regularly. I'm not sure I've ever actually read anything written by the Comedy God of Something Awful, Lowtax, until today.
I wondered if he was just having a lame day. This beating-a-dead-horse didn't seem at all like the kind of sparkling wit that people always kinda implied Lowtax was capable of when apologizing for other people's writing on the site, or for the behavior of the "tl;dr lollersk8ts <img src=goatse.cx> what" crowd. So I poked in the archives and read the previous article by him. And it was the same exact thing. A long litany of the imbecelity of some people whose bodies are less than perfect who dared to do something creative, silly, and shamelessly dorky, and didn't have the skills yet to do it perfectly. And it went on way too long.
I began to wonder if this guy has a secret desire for cosplay he's denying, given that the furry article was obsessed with fursuit sex.
Then I used SA's search feature and asked for all articles by Rich "Lowtax" Kyanka. I poked at random through them, looking for funny. I smirked a few times. I didn't giggle or laugh. Mostly I felt like I was reading a lame clone of Dave Barry, with an obsession with mocking anything that's done with far more heart than skill. Who is occasionally mildly bemusing but ruins it by just running his point into the ground - every single article seemed like it was at least half again as long as it should have been. This guy needs to edit his stuff, badly.
Was this guy ever funny? SA is his site, right, I'm told it owes its popularity to his skill at humor. I don't see this. He's not even very good at mocking fish in a barrel.
Is he funnier if I browse with images on? He sure isn't funny without his props. Kinda like Gallagher without the vicarous glee of the Sledge-O-Matic.
The first person who points me to an article by Lowtax that actually makes me laugh is going to get some kind of reward. Probably art.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
(And your layout only works in IE for me XD)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:37 pm (UTC)Argh, I hate cross-browser issues. It's beautiful for me in Mozilla, honest. (And the fact that it's never been adequately tested is part of why I don't use custom-skinned comments pages - that and the fact that I dislike them.)
*rantrantrant!*
Date: 2004-05-12 11:25 pm (UTC)Most of the time, this isn't a problem, because my friends page links automatically add "?style=mine", but if I follow a link from somewhere else and want to post something, usually I'll go up and *manually* add "?style=mine" to the URL just because it's the *easiest* thing to do!
Re: *rantrantrant!*
Date: 2004-05-13 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 01:12 pm (UTC)Opera's told to be picky, and unlike Moz and IE it doesn't ignore script errors by guessing... but nevermind *finds somewhere to leech broadband*
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 07:47 pm (UTC)If Something Awful, LJDrama, etc., don't dry up this year, they will the next. Once the users get bored with the content, all they'll have is community, and these people don't have much love for each other. They'll graduate, or they'll gravitate towards various forms of geekery, maybe go to a political website and bitch about things that matter, but SA will soon be a forgotten net curiosity, like Total Entertainment Network, or that old webcam page of the Amiga user's cat.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 08:32 pm (UTC)And it's a damn shame.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 10:20 pm (UTC)also found during the images search
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 11:31 pm (UTC)You're better than that.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 11:14 pm (UTC)*grin*
SeanBaby, after all, has educated me to the fact that Turkish knockoffs of popular movies are utterly, utterly more bizarre than anyone should be allowed to come up with.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 11:31 pm (UTC)...
Oh wait, you said SeanBaby, not SockBaby.
Never mind!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 01:16 am (UTC)http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=287
http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=299
http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=290
There's a bunch more but I remember these the best.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 02:31 am (UTC)Considering their sponsorship by all manner of unwholesome sites and the glaringly obvious and rarely denied fact that they're all dorks of one stripe of another, you'd think they'd be less astonished by other forms of geekery... but then they'd be out of a job, I suppose. But look at it this way; if it weren't for their ALoDs, some of us wouldn't have quite the selection of awesome bookmarks that we do.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 07:29 am (UTC)Two the Ranting Griffon and Something Awful Lowtax STEEL CAGE DEATHMATCH!
They're the same sort of dullish humour but dyametrically opposed! It'd be glorious although I think Lowtax would probably lose. Doesn't appear to have as much lung capacity. Two is skinnier and can probably keep it up longer unless Lowtax gave up and hit him with a chair.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 09:09 am (UTC)