comics befuddlement
Aug. 3rd, 2003 02:01 amSo I was at the bookstore tonight with
ultraken being bad and browsing graphic novels off the rack. I skimmed the collection of the much-lauded 'Herobear and the Kid'.
I do not see what people see in this self-indulgent, saccharine stuff. I didn't in the first issue. Even less so after discovering the backstory of it tonight, and seeing (a) three or four glowing quotes at the end of every issue's worth of story in the collection, and (b) almost half the book taken up by design sketches.
Let the comic speak for itself, man. I can see having review puffery on the back of the actual issues of the comic; the package has to be its own advertising to some degree. But having those in the middle of the collected book is just plain wrong. And then being so in love with the previous versions of the project that you fill up almost as many pages with old concept sketches, parts of the HB&tK film pitch, several pages on your working method, pinups you've done for other artists' books, completely unrelated doodles, and whatnot? Sure, I like seeing a few pages at the back of the collected volume with design roughs, early explorations, and guest art, but this is way over the line into self-love.
(oh, shut up and work on your oh-so-brilliant comic, Peggy. Shame messy stuff like this with tightly chaotic art and script, not with snide masturbation asides.)
I do not see what people see in this self-indulgent, saccharine stuff. I didn't in the first issue. Even less so after discovering the backstory of it tonight, and seeing (a) three or four glowing quotes at the end of every issue's worth of story in the collection, and (b) almost half the book taken up by design sketches.
Let the comic speak for itself, man. I can see having review puffery on the back of the actual issues of the comic; the package has to be its own advertising to some degree. But having those in the middle of the collected book is just plain wrong. And then being so in love with the previous versions of the project that you fill up almost as many pages with old concept sketches, parts of the HB&tK film pitch, several pages on your working method, pinups you've done for other artists' books, completely unrelated doodles, and whatnot? Sure, I like seeing a few pages at the back of the collected volume with design roughs, early explorations, and guest art, but this is way over the line into self-love.
(oh, shut up and work on your oh-so-brilliant comic, Peggy. Shame messy stuff like this with tightly chaotic art and script, not with snide masturbation asides.)
no subject
Date: 2003-08-03 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-03 11:01 am (UTC)Oh, every issue has concept sketches, so all the stuff at the back of the collected volume is what you would've gotten if you had bought the individual issues? Okay, it's vaguely less masturbatory. But that still means that every issue must've been about 1/3 preliminary art...
no subject
Date: 2003-08-03 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-03 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-03 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-04 08:16 am (UTC)herobear is pretty slick, i think. though yeah, just get on the with storytelling, already. save the filler and masturbation for the 10 year retrospective, etc.
speaking of which... *backs to work*
no subject
Date: 2003-08-05 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-05 08:43 pm (UTC)everyone has to start somewhere
Date: 2003-08-04 01:59 pm (UTC)Well, Herobear certainly taint John Marc DeMatteis' "Moonshadow" -:P
I'm personally awaiting the film adaptations of "A Fine and Private Place" (Peter S Beagle), "To Reign in Hell" (Steven Brust), "Zod Wallop" (William Browning Spencer), "Expiration Date" (Tim Powers)
When "Robert's Rules of Order" comes out by Vertigo, that'll be the apocalypse, for sure
Until then, life is good -:D