just one of those thoughts
Sep. 29th, 2003 09:09 pmWhat would I do if a horde of net.bastards descended upon my LJ? I don't think they're at all likely to, as I keep my freakiness private or cloak it in irony - I don't wave my fetishes, sexual preferences, or delusions around for everyone to see. Not blatantly, at least - if I refer to my secrets in public, it's usually under at least one layer of metaphor.
I also doubt I'd be an entertaining target. I'm too well-spoken and cynical. If my life had been bent and broken differently, I might be a smug net.bastard myself. I think I'd probably just sigh, set comments to friends-only for a while, and put up an informational entry to that effect, that had an elliptical sneer at the people who caused me to do it.
I also doubt I'd be an entertaining target. I'm too well-spoken and cynical. If my life had been bent and broken differently, I might be a smug net.bastard myself. I think I'd probably just sigh, set comments to friends-only for a while, and put up an informational entry to that effect, that had an elliptical sneer at the people who caused me to do it.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 09:46 pm (UTC)Is an elliptical sneer...
Date: 2003-09-29 09:47 pm (UTC)(Or a parabolic grin?)
(Or a...fourth-order...Bessel function...look of dismay?...)
--Multiplication Rock
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 11:12 pm (UTC)If things got bad, I might set it to screen non-friend comments as well.
Re: just one of those thoughts
Date: 2003-09-29 11:52 pm (UTC)I keep all my freakiness hidden, so it'd have to be a really slow day for PoE or SA or whatever other net.bastard sites are out there to target me, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-29 11:15 pm (UTC)Re: just one of those thoughts
Date: 2003-09-29 11:27 pm (UTC)Re: just one of those thoughts
Date: 2003-09-30 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-09-30 05:57 am (UTC)Honestly, I think if you caught their eye, they'd start from "OMG FURRIE LOL" and work their way backwards. They're terribly good at "spotting" embarrassing things in people's journals, at magnifications that would make particle physicists blush, then running back to their own turf and pretending they've discovered something hilarious. Just the idea of a "furry" -- and thus, by definition, an obese fursuit-wearing arrested adolescent with no job and no sense of self-respect -- calling herself "well-spoken" could set some of these people off. "Look, she's so full of herself!"
But the odds of you maintaining their attention is pretty low. They'd have to have a reason to gawk in the first place. You do have a pretty low gawk factor, and you're too laid back to give them "Tar Baby" style entertainment by whining or fighting back. You need to provide a cheap thrill first, and brainy genderfucked artgirls aren't really that. Now, OTOH, if a subculture of Jazz Age flapper wannabes somehow arises in the next two months, with an easily identifiable stereotype and lots of snide epithets associated with them, you're screwed. :)
Personally, I prefer to fight back and give the sympathizers a laugh at their expense. The entertainment value to me is at least as great as it is to the bastards. :)
all the eyes that are watching watching
Date: 2003-09-30 07:42 am (UTC)i would think if that if you do manage slip along through net.life unnoticed and unremarked upon, it has far less to do with any "too well-spoken and cynical" etc. merits.. since even that presumes the net.bastards are somehow aware of you.. but more to do with the fact that people simply don't know you exist. and won't. or don't care. and won't.
although it -is- entertaining to think about contingency plans for being the center of some sort of attention ^_^
no subject
Date: 2003-09-30 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-30 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-30 01:28 pm (UTC)(Okay. I feel better now. What in the cyberworld spawned this thought of yours?)