twenty-nine years of progress

[egypturnash]

For instance, on some computers there are marvelous text-editing systems
which allow pieces of text to be "poured" from one format into another,
practically as liquids can be poured from one vessel into another. A thin page can
turn into a wide page, or vice versa. With such power, you might expect that it
would be equally trivial to change from one font to another-say from roman to
italics. Yet there may be only a single font available on the screen, so that such
changes are impossible. Or it may be feasible on the screen but not printable by
the printer-or the other way around. After dealing with computers for a long time,
one gets spoiled, and thinks that everything should be programmable: no printer
should be so rigid as to have only one character set, or even a finite repertoire of
them-typefaces should be user-specifiable! But once that degree of flexibility has
been attained, then one may be annoyed that the printer cannot print in different
colors of ink, or that it cannot accept paper of all shapes and sizes, or that it does
not fix itself when it breaks...

- Douglas Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach (1979)

After dealing with computers for a long time, most of these things are now malleable. But nobody is surprised when the machine breaks, or that it cannot repair itself...

Comments

[mmsword.livejournal.com]

Strangely enough, most of our computers DO fix themselves when they break, within certain tolerances. How many times has a problem occured, only to be fixed by a reboot?