This is a quick size test for that crazy comic Nick and I have been playing with the past month. Nine inches square plus a 1/4" margin all around, or so Illustrator thinks, rendered out at 75dpi. I dunno where it gets 684px square from, exactly, but it's a nice size for the screen.

The actual comic will be better-drawn than this quick size test, and may well even rely on outlines. It will, however, have similar color schemes to this - very stripped-down, mostly monochromatic with the occasional accent color. I probably need to dig up some better textures to lay over it than a plain ol' "mezzotint", too.
And yes, square pages. I was toying with the idea of building it on a golden rectangle; it's pretentious enough that this might make sense. With the size of paper I have handy, though, I'd end up drawing way too small if I went with that. So square it is.
And the Inspector is normally not afflicted with Tourette's.

The actual comic will be better-drawn than this quick size test, and may well even rely on outlines. It will, however, have similar color schemes to this - very stripped-down, mostly monochromatic with the occasional accent color. I probably need to dig up some better textures to lay over it than a plain ol' "mezzotint", too.
And yes, square pages. I was toying with the idea of building it on a golden rectangle; it's pretentious enough that this might make sense. With the size of paper I have handy, though, I'd end up drawing way too small if I went with that. So square it is.
And the Inspector is normally not afflicted with Tourette's.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-27 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 12:06 am (UTC)The only reason I ask is because the text here suits the overall comic marvelously.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 02:30 am (UTC)I actually noticed good lettering when I was reading comics as a kid. Bob Lappan in the DC stuff. Edward Gorey's distinctive hand. Walt Kelly. And god, some of Dave Sim's lettering is to die for. Any other character does a cross-over and their dialogue balloons match their host - but Cerebus? He's as much Dave Sim's expressive writing as he is that 50% zipatone.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 02:11 am (UTC)* the imagery, however, is still up in the air. I like the calligraphic quality of my conceptual pen sketches - but I also like the chaotic quality of things like this doodle, or this piece that helped start the whole thing. And this one for that matter.
Maybe my general rule of thumb will be "no use of the pen tool"? It'll keep it quick. And loose. Start with a pencil/pen layout - with the lettering in there! - and work over it in Illustrator. Sometimes keep the rough visible, sometimes not - it depends on my mood?
What about backgrounds? Do they allow the pen tool? I dunno. We'll see. I think the pen tool is verboten on characters for this, as a rule. Maybe not so much on bgs. It depends on the location.
Complex bgs like the initial Wormwood travelogue will probably show the realmedia lines, because otherwise they'd take forfuckingever to do in the computer.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 05:55 am (UTC)I also feel like quick, loose linework on paper will help keep the process of this fast, while having enough detail to keep me happy. I want to have detail in the drawings, but if I let myself do that in AI, I'll get bogged down in tiny, tiny details in every panel, and it'll never get finished.
I hadn't really thought of the lettering being anything but black - lettering, to me, kind of exists on a separate layer from the images. I just tried dropping the dark purple swatch over the black and it might work; I'll have to play with it. Thanks!
I haven't seen any of Morse's work that I can recall, but I know I'm being influenced by Paul Pope's "Heavy Liquid" - I only flipped through it in the store, but his use of nothing but blue and red plates (as I recall) was really striking. Most of the story will be in ultra-limited colors like this, with the palette shifting to show time/mood/etc, and of course there will be breaks into wider schemes, or into b&w, because I get bored!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 06:14 am (UTC)Morse did a spiffy little comic called "Southpaw," which had a (ulp) boxing tiger. I'd say it was an inspiration for fite but I hadn't seen it before I started doing the otters. The whole thing is in oranges only. This is very striking, though! Depending on where you post it, it will likely make a big splash!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 06:46 am (UTC)Ultimately the text is going to be written in real media; I find that my handwriting looks pretty bad in AI due to the not-quite-immediate feedback, and it smoothing/abstracting the lines. It'll be a LOT more expressive and legible if it's done on paper.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 07:45 am (UTC)Or else they're in the shadow of "I really hate drawing and am trying to minimize the work in that arena". Cut-and-paste is the rule of the day!
There's exceptions - and there are good reasons for choosing to work in these well-trodden paths, too. People who want to go for newspaper syndication need to hew to those limits, and practice cranking it out every day. (and hell, I need to juggle a reasonable schedule vs. making this pretty - I want to see it finished sometime, and I don't want to put art policies in place that mean each page takes days!) But really... how many webcomics out there are done by practiced, mature artists? The vast majority are by people learning how to draw, how to tell stories, and how to use Photoshop all at once.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 07:46 am (UTC)It made Chris Ware famous!
Date: 2007-02-28 01:08 pm (UTC)Re: It made Chris Ware famous!
Date: 2007-03-01 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-28 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-02 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 03:34 am (UTC)All I can say is thank God. There's enough of this "I'm going to draw in a shape that does not fir on any screen because that is the way I think comics have to be" stuff floating around.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 04:23 am (UTC)My template has reference marks for 1/2, 1/4, 1/3, and φ, and this may well be revamped as I learn what works.
I don't want to get into that infinite canvas thing, though. I've seen it done well and I've played with it in some of my single images, but I'm just not that interested in Playing With The Form.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 05:33 am (UTC)The worst part of Infinite Canvas is that it's not going to be preserved. It's a solely online trope - how the hell do you replicate it in the real world, and is it worth trying? - and websites vanish. It's going to be a lot harder to find seminal pieces of webcomics that're really using the web, forty years in the future, than it'll be to find stuff caught in paper.
Changing the format suddenly, from a normal-sized page to a five-mile-long one, is potentially pretty powerful. I was amazed when I read "When I Am King" back in '03 or whenever. But how the hell is that gonna survive?