doodles: why I should avoid Photoshop.
May. 24th, 2005 07:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Two weird scribbles with story behind them of sorts. Both quickly tarted up in Photoshop instead of the usual Illustrator treatment, though I might do AI on one or both. Contains boobs, you're warned.

Four Moving One Seen and her pet/toy/apprentice Pretty Fifth Gem Whom Wiles Have Conquered.
Four Moving One Seen is a Trickster, a vixen, a seductress, and far too cunning for her own good. Pretty Fifth Gem Whom Wiles Have Conquered is... maybe going to get to be a vixen someday too, if she plays her cards right and obeys the right orders and breaks the right ones.
Some of the tails are imaginary.

Meanwhile, Rikal gets a ride on the back of a friendly rocket-spider. This may be a sign of insanity on xir part, but it's fun. Even if they're going a couple hundred miles an hour just off the ground.

Four Moving One Seen and her pet/toy/apprentice Pretty Fifth Gem Whom Wiles Have Conquered.
Four Moving One Seen is a Trickster, a vixen, a seductress, and far too cunning for her own good. Pretty Fifth Gem Whom Wiles Have Conquered is... maybe going to get to be a vixen someday too, if she plays her cards right and obeys the right orders and breaks the right ones.
Some of the tails are imaginary.

Meanwhile, Rikal gets a ride on the back of a friendly rocket-spider. This may be a sign of insanity on xir part, but it's fun. Even if they're going a couple hundred miles an hour just off the ground.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:22 pm (UTC)I used to enjoy "hard" SF, but I quit caring so much about the tech theory. Or quit pretending to care. These days I kinda tend towards stuff that has an emotional component to it, or stuff that explores some weird corner. Or carelessly complex modern space opera!
A lot of the "classics" are, frankly, unreadable. Doc Smith or van Vogt are tough to plow through.
The authors I find myself re-reading the most right now are Michael Swanwick and Iain (M.) Banks. On and off I go re-read some of Gene Wolfe's stuff but I don't always have the energy to climb the mountains of his books! Now and then I might read some Bruce Sterling or William Gibson... and every so often I keep pulling out my copy of the complete works of Cordwainer Smith.
Like anyone else around Puzzlebox, I've read a lot of stuff listed on the wiki's suggested reading - and looking at the first book reminds me that I should re-read it!
But I've been reading SF as long as I can remember reading. At one point I had pretty much all of Larry Niven's work - I didn't get rid of it, I just stopped getting more and he kept writing. I've got a decent pile of Heinlein, of Asimov, of Bradbury... I've read a lot of it, and little bits of everything pop up here and there.
And I love drawing fins. My graphic sense tends to create futures somewhere between Buck Rogers and the Jetsons. My narrative sense demands much more ambiguity of motive.
All that said... plastic-hulled spiders who swarm about the asteroid belt, and mind-controlling kitsune from the outer planets, are definitely in the realm of science fantasy.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:32 pm (UTC)Wait a minuet, why the hell do I have a pile of Heinlen and Rand? If I took a picture of it someone might mistake me for a rugged individualist! I think I’ll re-position those behind the Star Wars professional fan fiction novels from Jr. High.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:49 pm (UTC)But hell. More than you think of this stuff might be in the library, or a used book store. SGet what you can find; explore. You'll find some interesting new things lingering in your head... and you might look at something in Puzzlebox and say "oh, I know where she swiped that from now!".
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 12:19 am (UTC)Seeing what other people have been thinking could only be good for me, or at least worth snerking at. I can see the parallel between you--the You I Know(just a whispy, white shadow dancing around in the night.)-- and your art. It's you.
I remember picking up a book about AI, actual AI, and reading much of it. Then I bored my class half to death with my report on AI.. Hm.
....
*flee*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:50 am (UTC)You get a little of it seeping into the better visual media, including adaptations of books... but you can throw a lot more ideas out a lot more easily in a book. A good book is a high density of New Ideas.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:20 pm (UTC)I should play her on Puzzlebox somehow...