okay.

[egypturnash]

According to that LJMatch Sexual Compatability thing that's infecting everyone, I should not be fucking anybody around here. Good thing I'm not. Nobody rose over 50% "compatibility". Maybe it's basing compatibility partially on how close to me people are. I dunno.

I'm not about to cut and paste the HTML in. It's ass-ugly and I don't want to try and fix it. Sexual chemistry is a little too complex to sum up in a dozen multiple-choice questions, anyway...

[ addendum: I am, however, 52% sexually compatible with myself! Better lay in the self-love supplies. Must be because I'm a bi switch gal who's not into feet. ]

Comments

[saberwind.livejournal.com]

Not sure why it is that I've yet to see anyone have anyone on their list score over a fifty percent... But personality matching is so much more important, ne? ^^

[shatterstripes.livejournal.com]

Yeah. If you like the person, you'll indulge their kinks sometimes unless they're in the serious NO WAY zone, 'cause you love them, and you know it'll make them get off better, and if it's a healthy relationship, they'll smile and give in to your kinks that don't completely scare them, too.

Good sex comes from making someone you care about a lot writhe in pleasure, not from emotionless matching up of fetishes! Or maybe I'm just a hopeless romantic.

[saberwind.livejournal.com]

Well other than making me squirm and blush with your casual wordings; you are exactly right and I could not possibly agree more. Even though I wasn't particularly talking about love in regards to sex, just love in general. ^^;

Though, you're talking to a guy who blushes at every opportunity, likes reading, snuggling, candlelight dinners, and suprising special people with flowers. You're not alone in hopeless romanticissim. :}

[tabriscoonz.livejournal.com]

Those tests are weird! Eselgeist showed up on mine twice for normal compatibility and both had different percentages.
My highest was 57%, I want B to take it to see if we can get 70%

[lapdragon.livejournal.com]

LJ quizzes are stupid anyhow.

Can I have your babies?

[shatterstripes.livejournal.com]

Well, I sure don't want them! Except maybe as snacks.

[doodlesthegreat.livejournal.com]

Biggest flaw: It asks what you like, but doesn't ask if it's something you'd require from a partner. Makes the whole test useless.

[martes.livejournal.com]

I was afraid of who I might end up compatible with, so I didn't try it.

[mattlazycat.livejournal.com]

Highest compatibility I got was 58%, which was a bit discouraging, but only for as long as I took the results seriously (i.e., a few seconds). I find it amusing seeing just how wrong these tests can be. :)

[shatterstripes.livejournal.com]

Yeah, just the fact that the original one rates people as "110% compatible" made me not be willing to put much faith in their math! Especially when I went through the questions.

Like, okay, I'm kinda into a lot of mildly kinky things, but don't really require anything to get off, so that makes me "more" or "less" compatible with someone? Well, I guess if they insisted on always being dominant, or always worshipping my feet, it'd get old, yeah, but... eh. Sexual compatibility is a lot about personality compatibility, for me; I wouldn't want to make love to anyone I couldn't talk to afterwards.

[queenofstripes.livejournal.com]

Technocracy in action. If we can measure it, it must mean something by definition, right? ;) If it's any consolation, my highest was a 51% and I haven't seen anything higher than a 67% on anyone's journal.

[kamenkyote.livejournal.com]

What I still don't understand is how some folks can show up on my list but I not on theirs, or vice versa, which just lends credence to the whole "it's really messed up" idea. And yah, it's an LJ quiz. Worth the price you pay.

-T'