hooray for censorship
Jan. 8th, 2004 10:54 amHey, artists. I think you definitely don't want to upgrade to Photoshop 8/CS.
Seems it won't let you do much with images of money any more... here's some in-depth analysis of the limitations.
Seems it won't let you do much with images of money any more... here's some in-depth analysis of the limitations.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:16 am (UTC)I think I can show you though...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 11:58 am (UTC)1. Gimp 2.0 prerelease is out.
2. Any currency I make will be my own CardCash!!!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:16 pm (UTC)Unless someone can manage to do a bit of espionage, get the full Photoshop source tree, disable this 'feature' in the source, then compile for Mac and Windows both...
Meanwhile, I'm sticking with PS7 until a version comes out that has the required feature of 'no longer crases in the version of the OS I just updated to'. Because all I mostly use it for is scanning and the occasional bit of texture silliness.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:47 pm (UTC)Hmmm... How to do all those fiddly details and engraving lines in AI without going mad...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 01:43 pm (UTC)inunnovation", but rather something that some higher agency has pressured them into adding. Considering that measures such as these are all but useless if they're not ubiquitous, I'd expect to see a lot more packages featuring this kind of behaviour.The good news is that apparently this works in the same way as some photocopiers in that it detects a pattern of obscured dots on the new US$20 and many other currencies. These dots are apparently blue on the new $20, but they're yellow on my £10 note. This means two things:
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 02:17 pm (UTC)True - but I think pretty much all the artist pros I want to give a heads-up to on this use PS, not PSP.
Yeah, apparantly it's a certain dot pattern. Once I find out for sure what this dot pattern is, I believe I may start including it in all my artwork from now on... it'd a nice accent for my signature!
The thing is... it's checking every image you load, every image you paste in, every image you bring into the program by any means. (There's some kind of hole involving bringing it into ImageReady and a special path between that and PS, but I'm sure that'll be plugged in a maintenance patch soon.)
And... the iconography of money is a powerful thing. By not allowing people to manipulate images of it, avenues of commentary are being forcibly shut off. By a little chunk of dumb code.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 02:57 pm (UTC)Not that I've done that or anything... and anything else I would say is political rambling, so... I think I'll just stick to 7.0 for now.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 05:19 pm (UTC)Well to me it's less about the code than the people who forced it to be included, but yeah, I'm not disagreeing with you that it's dumb and pointless. :) I potatoshopped a dollar-bill (http://lazycat.org/postcards/include.html) myself not so long ago (though not very well, at that). I can easily understand people getting pissed off that they can't do that any more.
I wonder what they aim to achieve by stopping image manipulation - it's not like you can just print off a fresh copy of the note and spend it. The inks are special, there's the plastic ribbon with the printing on it, the texturing, the watermark, the material of the notes themselves. It's bizarre that they'd restrict this aspect.
Also, since it's dots and the relative distances between them, I wonder if taking photos in perspective, or in larger numbers would make any difference? Or scanning in two halves and using photoshop to stitch them together again (after all, putting each half in a layer and setting one to "Difference" is basically designed to make such a thing piss-easy :). Sure, there'd be some artistic compromise involved, but you're not a real artist unless you've suffered for the craft ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 08:08 pm (UTC)Which suggests that placing an appropriately coloured sheet of translucent plastic - say a sheet for an overhead projector - between scanner bed and currency could neatly sidestep the problem when combined with the colour adjustments that are available in both programs.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 02:35 pm (UTC)Does it send the info to anyplace? Or does it just crash?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 08:07 pm (UTC)