skittery splodgy shapes
Jun. 26th, 2005 03:26 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was idly looking around on DeviantArt and I noticed that
dark_aldebaran had favorited pretty much all the drawings I did of raccoons. Somehow this made me decide to fool around in Illustrator with no pencil sketch, and draw a raccoon.
I like drawing raccoons!

I did some experimenting with simulated colored paper, but I couldn't convince Illustrator to make my inks opaque. Just some late night fooling around, you know? The background probably has floating rocks with trees on it because I ended up on Roger Dean's website the other week.
(And, of course, DA is being a bitch - or maybe it's that my upstream connection is being a pain again - and I can't get the image up on there. Figures.)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I like drawing raccoons!

I did some experimenting with simulated colored paper, but I couldn't convince Illustrator to make my inks opaque. Just some late night fooling around, you know? The background probably has floating rocks with trees on it because I ended up on Roger Dean's website the other week.
(And, of course, DA is being a bitch - or maybe it's that my upstream connection is being a pain again - and I can't get the image up on there. Figures.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 03:57 am (UTC)Which is a roundabout way of saying, no it doesn’t, it’s beautiful and everything you do is art.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 04:17 am (UTC)- a penis with rabbit ears
- a Pikachu with a large cock, saying "pikaskru!"
- a penis flying through the air, spurting, screaming "Splortle!"
- ahairy, disembodied ass, shouting "ANIX!"
- a fragment of some sort of little tank
- a penis costumed as Elvis, saying "uh-uh huh!"
(Many of these things were illuminations of Bad IdeasIt also feels like a failure because I wanted it to be two solid colors, and had to resort to several tints of those two colors instead, because of lack of planning!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 09:15 am (UTC)Charbroiling! Char!
Oh crap, now I'm anthropomorphizing fast food again...nuts! Cashews!
"Failure" is not really the word I'd associate with that particular image...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 04:04 am (UTC)Hand them over.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 04:39 am (UTC)Oh, and a big rectangle with a mezzotint, dropped down to 10% multiply, to put some texture on the bg.
This is straight out of Illustrator 101, in terms of technique. No blends, no Appearance palette madness, nothing really magical at all. Just me and the pencil tool and my Wacom tablet.
What you really want in this case is my cartooning skillz.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 05:31 am (UTC)But you still have to deal with those fucking anchor points. Not impossible; I do it all the time for logos 'n' shit. But still a pain in the ass.
What you really want in this case is my cartooning skillz.
I've already got some. They're very nice.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 05:37 am (UTC)And also frankly you're probabally a better cartoonist than me, but don't rub it in, okay? =;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 05:52 am (UTC)(Other drawings where I make heavy use of the pencil tool: ground foliage, entire image, layered fog shapes, layered art brushes everywhere, most of the figure. if you want to compare and contrast to ones that're mostly pen tool.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 06:31 am (UTC)S'okay. I took it in the spirit in which it was intended. I hope. =;) I do really admire your work. The composition, the line quality, the willingness to experiment, it's all really great.
Anyway, thanks for the tips.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 03:12 pm (UTC)A comic in that style would be so great.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-27 02:28 am (UTC)I selfishly hope you two will try again when things pick up.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 05:44 am (UTC)Nope. Not for this image. Not once you've configured the pencil and brush tools to not be stupid. Double-click on them in the toolbar and turn off "keep selected"; then you can draw really rapidly.
I think I actually touched a total of, oh, ten anchor points in the process of making this. "Touch" meaning "made with the pen tool" or "selected and tweaked".
Normally I'm all about careful creation of the anchor points; my "one true tool" icon has the pen tool active for a reason. I've learnt a few of the secrets of easy operation of it, and I constantly hot-swap tools with ctrl/alt/apple.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 06:05 am (UTC)(And hey, why the surprise? Everyone loves a quicky.) ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 09:28 am (UTC)I love those images of yours that seem to put the characters at the center of a vortex of graphical chaos (that I know takes a fair amount of work and fiddling to pull off). Am I right in thinking that a great many things seem to be on *fire* in this picture, or is that deliberately left to interpretation? It sure says "dancing in the flames" to me, but... :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 10:29 pm (UTC)Mostly I do the graphical chaos because I avoid backgrounds. And... the 'fire' wasn't at all something I intended, but I can definitely see it in a few places now that it's been suggested. I was going more for a chaotic, loose, too-full-of-energy feel. Which, I suppose, is metaphorically close to "on fire".
But what looks like pale blue fire on the planetoid she's standing on is just me taking the art brush I'd made for the right hand's trail, then switched out for an entirely different effect, and scribbling behind the planet to make it pop into the foreground more. I was mostly thinking "this is some kind of scribbly splattery glow" when I did it.
And, of course, as I said on the phone this evening ( <3< ) the original working colors were very firey...
Dancing in the flames, not caring that everything is falling apart around her. Falling apart herself, in some way, but still definitely female, and on top of things, and maybe responsible for the chaos. Maybe this is more about my current situation than I intended it to be...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-27 01:32 pm (UTC)But the shapes are still raggedy enough that I don't want to blow it up to fill my desktop.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 10:47 am (UTC)It is kinetic in appearance
And fun
Ain't that enough ?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 11:03 am (UTC)I realize she's probably supposed to be running or dancing, but my interpretation of this picture is that she has anchored herself to the earth by one foot, and then, with one sweeping gesture of power, turned all the gravity off.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 10:40 pm (UTC)Honestly, I have no clue what she's doing. I just drew this dynamic pose and went from there, finishing it off in a much looser, sloppy method than my usual hyper-anal pen tool shapes.
And in the back of my mind were the gravity-broken worlds of Roger Dean's covers for countless Yes albums, and the book The Shattered World.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-26 11:24 pm (UTC)